Bike Fan Club By Flycor, LLC

High-end Custom Bicycles >> Calfee Design Fan Club

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
superunleaded
captain


Reged: 12/22/03
Posts: 223
Re: Carbon Seatpost new [Re: skagwayroadie]
#4561 - 11/10/04 07:03 AM (68.122.74.190)

If you guys are into carbon posts, I'd recommend the Selcof. Hollow head design like the BCD but I think BCD went under.
Selcof has less "thud" or buzz on any road condition. Of course, JMHO.


Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Lon
sage
*****

Reged: 12/20/03
Posts: 595
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
Re: Carbon Seatpost new [Re: superunleaded]
#4563 - 11/10/04 01:13 PM (12.76.122.233)

I just bought a Selcof and I like it.

With a butt my size you have to understand there are billions of nerve endings...no doubt that leads to my "sensitive" rear. It is funny you metioned rails on seats...I have the same seat on 4 bikes...some have carbon rails and some have vanadium and that is one difference I can't feel. It is so personal.

Happy riding.


Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
flythebike
captain


Reged: 08/26/04
Posts: 272
Loc: N. Virginia, USA
Re: Carbon Seatpost new [Re: skagwayroadie]
#4564 - 11/10/04 03:25 PM (66.7.29.138)

I agree with you that a ti post feels smoother and less harsh (than Al), with just the tiniest bit of sway only noticeable under massive g-forces.

I probably wouldn't have picked the Campy post if I was building my bike up, because there are so many other choices, but it came on the bike and I see no reason to replace it, 'cause I likes' it.

USE just redesigned its post, with a better bolt design because their small bolts were stripping a lot. It is probably one of the lightest out there, although I'd have to check http://www.weightweenies.starbike.com/ to be sure.


Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
skagwayroadie
contributor


Reged: 12/20/03
Posts: 141
Loc: Alaska
Re: Carbon Seatpost new [Re: superunleaded]
#4573 - 11/11/04 01:31 AM (64.186.108.101)

Thanks Gas, I forgot about Selcof. I recall many mentions from you on this post from the old COG.

Lon, I am most sensitive to saddles too, but it ain't due to the size of my butt! haha I have never strayed from the Selle Italia Flite series once I found them. I have tried the Trans Am model and the Max flite and it is great for the mtn bike, but I still prefer the original Flite for the road. I am interested in trying an Ax-Liteness saddle...I wonder how it will feel with a CF post.

Happy Riding...email.


Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Lon
sage
*****

Reged: 12/20/03
Posts: 595
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
Re: Carbon Seatpost new [Re: skagwayroadie]
#4575 - 11/12/04 12:57 PM (12.147.220.155)

I started on a Selle Italia Novus in about 97 or so. I like it as well and stay with it. Unfortunately it is out of production. I have 4 "in reserve."

Have a nice weekend! We are supposed to have sun.


Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
SAVAGEP
new member


Reged: 11/13/04
Posts: 7
Re: Fly vs Luna new [Re: Dana]
#4591 - 11/13/04 07:50 PM (166.77.209.191)

I ride a D'Fly - racing the New England hillclimbs - with some success in the 60+ age group.

It is an awesome bike - 60cm is 15.5 lbs with sane components. Actually strange components - it uses XTR derailleurs and an FSA triple crank (the hills hit 22%). DT shifter for the front and a Campy Record carbon brake lever on the left. DA 9 STI on the right

Alha Q sub 3.

I really like the Kestrel Carbon bar - the SL on the Calfee and a standard one on my 'cross bike.

I might have gone back to Campy - but needed the flexibility of gearing choices you get with Shimano.

I've used Topolinos, Velomax and American Classic wheels.

All are great. The Velomax seem to be the best in terms of fit and finish - the hubs are like silk, when you hold a wheel and spin it you feel nothing. Topolinos give a nice ride but are slightly affected by strong cross winds. Am Classics are stiff.

For racing I use the Selle Italia SLR. I've actually ridden centuries on that seat also. However, the Aliante is like sitting on molded air - for my butt at least the most comfortable ever.

Seatpost is an Alien. The most difficult to adjust part ever designed for a bike. Also I had slippage problems in the early days - you must scrupulously clean the inside of the seat tube with alcohol to get ALL of the CF dust out - it is a great lubricant.

Cinelli Solido stem - but take great care with the Ti bolts. Much Ti Prep and use a torque wrench.


Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
skagwayroadie
contributor


Reged: 12/20/03
Posts: 141
Loc: Alaska
Re: Fly vs Luna new [Re: SAVAGEP]
#4601 - 11/14/04 06:30 PM (64.186.108.156)

SavageP...
that is a nice bike you got there. I bet you impress the younger population blasting up them hills! And it is an odd mix of components to use on a bike of this caliber...Odd, but effective.

I will use a XTR rear derailleur and cassette combined with 7700 series components and perhaps an FSA compact crank for my Fly, when I save up enough to get it. Lighter and easier to deal with than a 3x crank and nearly the gearing whencombined with a compact crank. I am also not 60, so I have youth on my side...for now anyway.

I too love those Kestrel bars...the best in IMHO!

It was not long ago that Mavic Heliums were the cream of the crop, now, they are average in weight and performance. Customs wheels are a fantastic buy these days given the prices of boutique wheels. Granted a new pair of Zipp's or similar CF rimmed wheels are extremely cool, and light, but they are way over-priced for the performance you get from them, unless you are sponsored or work in a shop.

...Mark


Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
dah
new member


Reged: 01/09/04
Posts: 19
Re: Handlebars new [Re: Dana]
#4672 - 11/25/04 07:13 PM (4.242.204.110)

Stick with the K-Sword bars. they are incredibly comfortable and the Predator/Praying Mantis look of them is pretty cool too. The only downside is locating the brake hoods where you want them can require a little filing if you want them higher on the bars.

It would also be cheaper to buy 2 cheap weyless stems from supergo to get the position right than buying 2 sets carbon handlebars. The K-Sword reach to both the tops and hoods is basically 1 cm further back than with tradtional bars (i.e. if you use a 12 cm stem with a regular bar you would use a 13 with the K-sword to get the same reach).

Several people have told me the ITM integrated K-sword stem is not that great. I use a Time monolink with mine, but the Deda Forza is probably a bit better if you don't use a torque wrench all the time since the max torque is quite a bit higher. As I recall either one makes a lighter combo than the ITM stem which is pretty heavy.


Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
bikernana
new member


Reged: 11/28/04
Posts: 1
Loc: Northern Calif
Re: Designing my new Calfee new [Re: Dana]
#4680 - 11/28/04 02:36 AM (209.247.222.46)

You won't regret getting a Calfee. Our Calfees have their own room in our house. I got my Luna Pro just over three years ago and it's been great. I got fitted for mine because of having a bad back, outfitted it with Shimano works and Mavic wheels. I've never had a problem with it and am averaging 3500 miles a season on it. Regular cleaning and maintenence keeps it going strong. Keep on pedaling!!

Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
flythebike
captain


Reged: 08/26/04
Posts: 272
Loc: N. Virginia, USA
Re: Designing my new Calfee new [Re: bikernana]
#4687 - 11/29/04 06:09 PM (66.7.29.138)

I just ordered a set of DT swiss wheels - hub 240s- spokes revolution F/non-drive alloy nipples; super cometition drive w brass nipples - rim RR 1.1. About $400 less than Kysriums on eBay. And, about 1475 gms for clinchers, so lighter, although not as aero. Also, with 28F/32R I can get home if I break a spoke, not so with some botique wheels. Will let y'all know how they work out.

Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Insightdriver
captain
***

Reged: 03/07/04
Posts: 472
Re: Designing my new Calfee new [Re: bikernana]
#4965 - 01/26/05 05:21 PM (192.55.52.2)

I chose a Tetra Pro based on the professional bike fittings I have had. I have a compressed disk in my spine and some other joint problems. I'm over 50. My body shape is such that most standard frames top tubes are too long for me and having a short stem is too much a compromise in bike position. I'm getting a frame as a part of a complete bike that is fitted to my body with a slightly more upright position for me on the bar to compensate for my back.

I read how some people say that you don't feel much a difference between a DFly, Tetra or Luna. I'd say that is true if all three are the same dimensions. Bike design is all about fit and function. My aim is for a bullet proof bike for regular daily riding and fitness. Both my LBS and Craig looked at my measurements and made decisions on frame size and angles based on those measurements. My LBS checked my fit multiple times over the years and did so just after entering my order for my bike once again.

I'm getting the Easton EC90 SLX fork
Shimano Ultegra drivetrain
Truvativ Rouleur Carbon 172.5 cranks 36/50 rings
Chris King headset
Kwing Carbon bar
Mavic Ksyrium Elite with Vittorio Rubino Pro rubber
Time Attac Caron mountain pedals (so I can use recessed cleats on my shoes)
Thomson Elite seatpost and X4 stem
WTB Laser V stealth saddle

With this ride I'll be able to ride for hours on end with the most comfortable bike I'll have ever ridden.


Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Lon
sage
*****

Reged: 12/20/03
Posts: 595
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
Re: Designing my new Calfee new [Re: Insightdriver]
#4966 - 01/26/05 11:02 PM (68.233.219.25)

Sounds great! You are absolutely right about fit being so important. I luckily can ride a standard size. Also a short stem can effect handling the same as an overly long stem.

Now be patient and relax.

Take care and many years of happy riding!


Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Insightdriver
captain
***

Reged: 03/07/04
Posts: 472
Re: Designing my new Calfee new [Re: Lon]
#4969 - 01/27/05 03:24 AM (67.164.230.144)

Thank you for the kind respnonse.

Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
flythebike
captain


Reged: 08/26/04
Posts: 272
Loc: N. Virginia, USA
Re: Designing my new Calfee new [Re: Insightdriver]
#4970 - 01/27/05 03:15 PM (66.7.29.138)

I believe you can use Coombe Pro pedals with recessed shoes - although you might need to pair off a little tread. They weigh a lot less than ATACs...which I love for off-road...www.combe.com. Here is a link that shows shoe compatibility. I totally love these pedals, they are very stiff and secure, and they don't use springs - nothing to wear out: http://www.coombe.com/shoe_compatibility.html.

Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Insightdriver
captain
***

Reged: 03/07/04
Posts: 472
Re: Designing my new Calfee new [Re: flythebike]
#4971 - 01/27/05 04:50 PM (192.55.52.2)

I have mentioned in a post in a different thread that I made compromises in choices of components. The choice of pedals was my LBS guy, I simply accepted. I looked at the Coombe pedals and agree they look like excellent pedals. I see, however, no compelling reason to make a change in my choice of pedal since the cost/performance is not significant enough to make enough of difference for my purposes. That said, I would not rule out making a change in the future.

For me, ordering my Calfee was the culmination of a dream I had for some time that had little chance of becoming real before I had a windfall come in. I had some agonizing over how much I was spending and into what componenets I should put my money into. I relied a great deal on my LBS, and for good reason. When spending a lot of money on anything, and not being an expert in the field the services of the LBS guy are not to be dismissed. In my case I do not know the bike industry well. I rely on my LBS to know what's out there, what parts are suitable for my riding style and the cost/benefits of those parts.

I am aware that with the level of customization available that most bikes in the price range I am in are unique, no two being completely alike. For example, I'm agnostic on choice of drivetrain. It was a market choice to get Shimano for my bike as there was sufficient lead time to order the group and it would be cheaper than Capmy due to the exchange rate. For some parts there is no clear best choice; there are multiple vendors that make perfectly adequate parts. For some particular parts it was simply that the LBS had them in stock, so it was a bird-in-hand situation.

I'm also pragmatic when I make choices. Knowing that my seatpost extension will be reasonably short on my bike it makes little difference whether I get carbon or aluminum. The difference in price/weight and function indicate no clear superiority of any particular seatpost. Another thought occurred to me as wrote this. I would eagerly make any component change if I could be shown that I could save consderable weight without paying considerably more money. For example, saving a few grams in pedals but paying about $100 more doesn't cut it with me. I know the performance difference would be insignificant. On the other hand paying that much more for a wheelset that had lighter rims would make sense if the wheelset was also as rugged as I want. For my purposes I tend toward bulletproof rather than highest performance.

It's a juggling act with performance, availability, weight, ruggednes and cost in specing out a complete custom bike. I think there are many ways to come to an adequate solution. Whether I could have done better with different choices than what I made/agreed to is moot. I believe my bike will suit me well. Time will tell, and the proof of the pudding is in the eating. When I finally get to ride my bike I will have the impressions gained that I will share with you all.


Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
flythebike
captain


Reged: 08/26/04
Posts: 272
Loc: N. Virginia, USA
Re: Designing my new Calfee new [Re: Insightdriver]
#4977 - 01/28/05 03:44 PM (66.7.29.138)

I race in a lot of Criteriums and with the Coombes you hit your shoe before you hit your pedal. You can pedal through 180s which helps with control and momentum. So they are the best choice for me. Do what works best for you from a cost-benefit viewpoint!

Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
flythebike
captain


Reged: 08/26/04
Posts: 272
Loc: N. Virginia, USA
Re: Fly vs Luna new [Re: SAVAGEP]
#4978 - 01/28/05 04:03 PM (66.7.29.138)

I disagree about Velomax. While the rims are durable and rarely require truing, I have found the seals on the rear hub to be poor. I had to replace the freehub body and bearings on the rear hub after eight months/3,000 miles or so, and after just a couple more thousand miles it is already starting to slip again, which could be disastrous if I had to use it while riding with people. I'm going to re-grease it and sell it. Maybe the quality has gotten better as they (the company) have aged. I ride in the rain. I've been told the daily limit for Topos is 160, so I don't ride 'em. I'm not seised (happy) to race 'em because the don't look so aero. Zipp 404s and 202s are my race day goods. Sometimes I wonder if I should just have a pair of three oh threes but whatever, we'll see how it goes this year.

Fizik is sponsoring my team this year with great prices on Aliantes so I'm going to pick one up if I can find the scratch. I have an Arione and it is wonderful. Talkin' hubs, I have a high opinion of the DT 240s, Mavic, Chris King (feels burly and smooth) and the Zipps are good too and look classic. Zipp's quick-change freehub takes one minute to swap and is a fine innovation. I just picked up a Zipp B2 oversize bar on eBay and it feels great and is shockingly light, and seems to have the right stiffness modulation but I haven't ridden it yet - I'm waiting on their stem that comes out in a month. Plus the Fly is in Calfeeland getting the 2nd life warranty. I'm adding a Chorus Carbon Crank that I bought not so much to shave weight as for the beauty of the thing, though it does have less heft than the Record alloy. I'm told that it is really the same crank as the Record, just with different decals. I've been riding and racing bikes hard for about 20 years now and I'm a month shy of putting togeher the dream machine, so color me stoked.

I figure people will see me on the line and already figure they have no chance...no excuses now!

Edited by flythebike (01/28/05 04:07 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
flythebike
captain


Reged: 08/26/04
Posts: 272
Loc: N. Virginia, USA
Re: Fly vs Luna new [Re: flythebike]
#4981 - 01/28/05 04:51 PM (66.7.29.138)

Oh I meant to say are you getting Ultegra 10? My LBS guy says it shifts better than Dura-Ace, although it is heavier.

Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Dana
new member


Reged: 09/28/04
Posts: 18
Re: Fly vs Luna new [Re: flythebike]
#4982 - 01/28/05 06:07 PM (66.139.176.75)

Quote:

I've been told the daily limit for Topos is 160




A daily limit?


Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Insightdriver
captain
***

Reged: 03/07/04
Posts: 472
Re: Fly vs Luna new [Re: flythebike]
#4985 - 01/28/05 08:50 PM (192.55.52.3)

I'm getting Ultegra ten speed. In fact I was confused as I was hitting manufacturer web sites as I was compiling pictures of the components I'm getting and before yesterday their site did not list the ten speed parts although I know they are in circulation. I just saw a message that their new web site went live yesterday and I am quite impressed with their site now.

Going ten speed is a coolness factor for me, basically. 9 speed with a compact crank would suit me. One more gear makes a bit of a difference but only on an extreme end. It's the latest and greatest is what floats my boat. I guess that comes from my technical background where things change so quickly the day you buy the latest it's already been eclipsed by newer the very next day.


Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
flythebike
captain


Reged: 08/26/04
Posts: 272
Loc: N. Virginia, USA
Re: Fly vs Luna new [Re: Dana]
#5009 - 01/31/05 02:50 PM (66.7.29.138)

Quote:

Dana wrote:
Quote:

I've been told the daily limit for Topos is 160




A daily limit?




Yeah weight limit. What do ya'll think of that?


Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
flythebike
captain


Reged: 08/26/04
Posts: 272
Loc: N. Virginia, USA
Re: Fly vs Luna new [Re: Insightdriver]
#5010 - 01/31/05 02:52 PM (66.7.29.138)

I had 9 speed compact and went to 10 speed and I don't really notice must difference. The main thing is that I can get a 13-26 for my training cassette which gives me both a 16 and an 18 tooth cog, which I like.

Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Dana
new member


Reged: 09/28/04
Posts: 18
Topos limit new [Re: flythebike]
#5011 - 01/31/05 03:02 PM (66.139.176.75)

Quote:

flythebike wrote:
Quote:

Dana wrote:
Quote:

I've been told the daily limit for Topos is 160




A daily limit?




Yeah weight limit. What do ya'll think of that?




Sounds contrived. You were refering to mileage in the context of the "160 daily limit". Now it is supposed to be a weight limit? This is a direct contradiction to the wheel specs and I have never seen anyone make this claim either.

I just thought the idea of a daily limit for a wheel was so bizarre that I was curious what your source was for that info...


Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
flythebike
captain


Reged: 08/26/04
Posts: 272
Loc: N. Virginia, USA
Re: Topos limit new [Re: Dana]
#5012 - 01/31/05 03:12 PM (66.7.29.138)

The experience of the shop I know that sells them reccomends that as a limit. Ride 'em as far as you want, just don't be a Clydesdale, as far as they're concerned. If I wanted to spend $800 on training wheels, I would have been inclined to argue with them, because by and large I'm pretty easy on wheels, even though I'm 180. But I wanted to save money there, and spend the money on race wheels, so I didn't press the issue.

Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Dana
new member


Reged: 09/28/04
Posts: 18
Re: Topos limit new [Re: flythebike]
#5022 - 01/31/05 11:02 PM (66.139.176.75)

I won't really be a good test for them either. I'm not that heavy and I don't push that hard.

Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
BikerDoug
friend


Reged: 12/29/03
Posts: 88
Re: Topos limit new [Re: Dana]
#5024 - 02/01/05 01:58 AM (66.219.217.101)

I am that heavy. I weigh 260, and put 1700+ miles on topolino wheels last year. So far, no problems whatsoever. There is a post on roadbikereview.com that said he had to replace the bearings after 1500 miles. It'll be interesting to see how mine hold up for another season.

Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Lon
sage
*****

Reged: 12/20/03
Posts: 595
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
Re: Topos Bearings new [Re: BikerDoug]
#5027 - 02/01/05 08:34 PM (68.233.219.25)

I don't know if your weight was the reason. I've seen posts that the rear hub in particular has bearings that tend to get loose. I wish more small manufacturers used "name" hubs so you know just what you are getting.

Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Bruce
contributor
*****

Reged: 12/27/03
Posts: 133
Loc: North of NYC
Re: Topos limit new [Re: Dana]
#5128 - 02/11/05 05:21 PM (216.105.105.38)

I've never heard of a Topo weight limit, or any other limit. I am 170-180 depending on the season and have had no problems with them. I know other riders heavier than I am with no issues.

Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)


Extra information
2 registered and 23 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Kahuna 

Print Thread

Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled

Rating: *
Thread views: 22274

Rate this thread

Jump to

Contact Us Bikefanclub.com

*
UBB.threads™ 6.4