High-end Custom Bicycles >> Calfee Design Fan Club Previous   Thread Index   Next   Flat

dfcas contributor Reged: 12/19/03 Posts: 143 Re: lateral-less tandems & carbon "fragility"?       12/29/06 01:49 PM (72.84.39.98) Edit   Reply   Quote   I wasn't clear in my post-I meant that his blathering makes me want to buy a Calfee or any brand other than Santana. I have heard these comments for years about how santanas are on the stable side,Co-Motion and calfee are quick handling,Cannondale is in the middle,and everyone seems to agree on this.BUT,looking at geometry charts,they all list a 73* degree head angle and fork rakes are all very close.At no place do trail numbers or wheelbase indicate any reason one would steer quicker or slower than the other. -------------------- no signature Post Extras

Entire thread Subject Posted by Posted on lateral-less tandems & carbon "fragility"? YalzaDon 12/26/06 04:49 AM Re: lateral-less tandems & carbon "fragility"? rob   01/05/07 04:53 PM Re: lateral-less tandems & carbon "fragility"? YalzaDon   01/22/07 03:06 AM Re: lateral-less tandems & carbon "fragility"? Insightdriver   12/26/06 08:35 AM Re: lateral-less tandems & carbon "fragility"? Lon   12/26/06 06:41 PM Re: lateral-less tandems & carbon "fragility"? dfcas   12/28/06 02:44 PM Re: lateral-less tandems & carbon "fragility"? vaxn8r   12/29/06 01:34 AM Re: lateral-less tandems & carbon "fragility"? Mike   12/29/06 01:48 AM Re: lateral-less tandems & carbon "fragility"? YalzaDon   12/30/06 04:32 PM Re: lateral-less tandems & carbon "fragility"? Mike   12/31/06 01:12 AM Re: lateral-less tandems & carbon "fragility"? YalzaDon   01/01/07 12:32 AM Re: lateral-less tandems & carbon "fragility"? Insightdriver   01/01/07 04:57 AM Re: lateral-less tandems & carbon "fragility"? dfcas   12/29/06 01:49 PM

UBB.threads™ 6.4